Prosecution Insights
Last updated: May 29, 2026

Spts Technologies Limited

5 pending office actions • 4 art units • 5 examiners • 0 of 5 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 12 patents granted in the last 365 days

Portfolio Summary

5
Total Pending OAs
5
Non-Final OAs
0
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 5 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

5
Overdue
0
Due this week
0
Due this month
0
Due in next 60 days
0
Due later

Deadline Fire Line

Every pending office action with a known statutory deadline, placed on a days-until-due axis. Dots left of Today are overdue; the further right, the more runway. Cases that share a deadline window stack vertically. 5 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date.

-30dToday30d60d90d120d
Overdue (5)

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

0
Hard (0%)
4
Medium (80%)
0
Easy (0%)
1
Unknown (20%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§103 only4 (80%)
No statute on record1 (20%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

4
Life Sciences
80% of docket
0
Information Tech
0% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
1
Semiconductors
20% of docket
0
Mechanical / Eng
0% of docket
0
Business / Other
0% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

50 h
Manual time on pending OAs
10 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
18 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.4 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
BRASFIELD, QUINTON A 1 72.0% +17.5%
KACKAR, RAM N 1 39.4% +59.0%
DUCLAIR, STEPHANIE P. 1 71.5% +19.8%
BRAYTON, JOHN JOSEPH 1 47.9% +22.2%
OTT, PATRICK S 1 66.5% +20.8%

Interview Candidates (5)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 5 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18213865 Control of Trench Profile Angle in SiC Semiconductors DUCLAIR, STEPHANIE P. 98d overdue
18387697 ANTI-STICTION LAYER DEPOSITION BRASFIELD, QUINTON A 49d overdue
17976798 PVD Method and Apparatus BRAYTON, JOHN JOSEPH 38d overdue
17461928 Deposition Method OTT, PATRICK S 31d overdue
18375238 Method and Apparatus for Plasma Etching Dielectric Substrates KACKAR, RAM N 30d overdue

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
1794 2
2814 1
1716 1
1713 1

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
18387697 ANTI-STICTION LAYER DEPOSITION BRASFIELD, QUINTON A 2814 §103 Non-Final OA 49d overdue Pending Nov 07, 2023
18375238 Method and Apparatus for Plasma Etching Dielectric Substrates KACKAR, RAM N 1716 §103 Non-Final OA 30d overdue Pending Sep 29, 2023
18213865 Control of Trench Profile Angle in SiC Semiconductors DUCLAIR, STEPHANIE P. 1713 §103 Non-Final OA 98d overdue Pending Jun 25, 2023
17976798 PVD Method and Apparatus BRAYTON, JOHN JOSEPH 1794 Other Non-Final OA 38d overdue Pending Oct 29, 2022
17461928 Deposition Method OTT, PATRICK S 1794 §103 Non-Final OA 31d overdue Pending Aug 30, 2021

Managing Spts Technologies Limited's Patent Portfolio?

IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month