Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 04, 2026

Amsel Ip Law

Technology area: Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering

19 pending office actions • 11 clients • 19 examiners • 17 art units • 0 of 19 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 9 patents granted in the last 365 days

Analysis

Amsel IP Law focuses its practice on Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering, where it has handled 155 career applications. This boutique firm size suggests a specialized approach to its clients' mechanical innovations. Currently, the firm has 16 pending office actions under its management, representing a healthy level of active prosecution.

The firm maintains a resolved allowance rate pct of 88.31, which is a strong indicator of its ability to secure patent protection. Prosecution efficiency is reflected in the 2.68 avg office actions per allowance. This figure suggests that the firm typically reaches an allowance in several substantive interactions with the examiner, providing a streamlined path to grant.

For clients in the Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering sector, the 88.31 resolved allowance rate pct offers a high degree of confidence. The 2.68 avg office actions per allowance indicates a prosecution process that is both effective and relatively efficient. With 155 career applications and 16 pending office actions, the firm demonstrates a consistent track record of success for its inventors.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Quality Metrics (n=155 apps, methodology: how we score firms)

88.3%
Allowance Rate
n=155
+0.49σ
Allowance Rate (norm)
n=155
2.7
OAs to Allowance
n=68
-0.38σ
OAs to Allow (norm)
n=68
711 days
Time to Allowance
n=68
+22.0pp
Interview Lift
n=155
22.1%
RCE Rate
n=155
1.4%
Appeal Rate
n=155

Rejection Performance (% of received rejections ultimately overcome)

—
§101 Overcome
n=16 (min 20)
63.0%
§102 Overcome
n=27
66.7%
§103 Overcome
n=54
54.6%
§112 Overcome
n=22

Specialization & Scale

G06F, H04L, G06T
Top CPC Subclasses
50%
Top-3 CPC Share
n=155
1
Practitioners
n=155
155.0
Apps / Practitioner
n=155

Portfolio Summary

19
Total Pending OAs
12
Non-Final OAs
7
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 4 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

1
Overdue
0
Due this week
2
Due this month
1
Due in next 60 days
0
Due later

Deadline Fire Line

Every pending office action with a known statutory deadline, placed on a days-until-due axis. Dots left of Today are overdue; the further right, the more runway. Cases that share a deadline window stack vertically. 4 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date.

-30dToday30d60d90d120d
Overdue (1)Due ≤ 30 days (2)Due ≤ 60 days (1)

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

12
Hard (63%)
6
Medium (32%)
1
Easy (5%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§101 only1 (5%)
§101 + other5 (26%)
§103 only5 (26%)
§102 only1 (5%)
§112 only1 (5%)
Multi-statute (no §101)6 (32%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

0
Life Sciences
0% of docket
5
Information Tech
26% of docket
2
Communications
11% of docket
2
Semiconductors
11% of docket
7
Mechanical / Eng
37% of docket
3
Business / Other
16% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

190 h
Manual time on pending OAs
38 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
66 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
1.7 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
SEBASTIAN, KAITLYN E 1 73.8% +20.4%
TELAN, MICHAEL R 1 42.8% +27.0%
CHAI, RAYMOND REI-YANG 1 74.7% +16.2%
MOSS, JAMES R 1 51.1% +41.6%
RADKE, JAY W 1 85.9% +8.5%
MIAH, LITON 1 75.3% +21.3%
HASSAN, AURANGZEB 1 80.3% +17.0%
PHAM, LY D 1 94.0% +3.4%
KROFCHECK, MICHAEL C 1 81.5% +16.9%
VAN DUZER, ALEXIS KIM 1 37.5% +46.7%

Quick Wins (2)

Cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate of 80%+ where the difficulty is Easy or Medium. The top 2 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18869501 3D MEMORY DEVICE WITH LOCAL COLUMN DECODING RADKE, JAY W —
18919179 FOLDED MEMORY MODULES HASSAN, AURANGZEB —

Hard Cases (12)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 8 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18752571 PLATFORM FOR MANAGING CONTEXTUAL AVAILABILITY OF ELECTRONIC HEALTH DATA VAN DUZER, ALEXIS KIM 60d overdue
19054751 OVERLAYING CONTENT AUGMENTING VIDEO DATA FROM A CONTENT PROVIDER SYSTEM DISPLAYED BY A CLIENT DEVICE TELAN, MICHAEL R 28d
19117843 ELECTRONICALLY GUIDED PRECISION MEDICAL TARGETING USING NEAR INFRARED FLUORESCENCE IMAGING SEBASTIAN, KAITLYN E —
18968990 SHIFT COMPLIANCE MANAGEMENT SYSTEM FOR PREVENTING PRESSURE ULCERS MOSS, JAMES R —
18895130 DATA BUFFER FOR MEMORY DEVICES WITH MEMORY ADDRESS REMAPPING PHAM, LY D —
18786296 CONTEXT-BASED COMPRESSION IN A MEMORY SYSTEM KROFCHECK, MICHAEL C —
18666621 ENEMA DELIVERY DEVICE FOR PEOPLE WITH IMPAIRED MOBILITY VOKES, KATHLEEN PAIGE —
18644896 CELL MANUFACTURING MANAGEMENT PLATFORM USING MACHINE LEARNING PEACH, POLINA G —

Interview Candidates (8)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 8 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18752571 PLATFORM FOR MANAGING CONTEXTUAL AVAILABILITY OF ELECTRONIC HEALTH DATA VAN DUZER, ALEXIS KIM 60d overdue
19054751 OVERLAYING CONTENT AUGMENTING VIDEO DATA FROM A CONTENT PROVIDER SYSTEM DISPLAYED BY A CLIENT DEVICE TELAN, MICHAEL R 28d
19117843 ELECTRONICALLY GUIDED PRECISION MEDICAL TARGETING USING NEAR INFRARED FLUORESCENCE IMAGING SEBASTIAN, KAITLYN E —
19039634 MULTI-MODAL PROGRAMMABLE SOUND-RESPONSIVE LIGHTING UNIT AND APPLICATION CHAI, RAYMOND REI-YANG —
18968990 SHIFT COMPLIANCE MANAGEMENT SYSTEM FOR PREVENTING PRESSURE ULCERS MOSS, JAMES R —
18938112 LEVERAGING A LARGE LANGUAGE MODEL FOR UNIVERSAL DISPATCH MESSAGING MIAH, LITON —
18919179 FOLDED MEMORY MODULES HASSAN, AURANGZEB —
18786296 CONTEXT-BASED COMPRESSION IN A MEMORY SYSTEM KROFCHECK, MICHAEL C —

Client Portfolio (11 clients)

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
37971
24261
28441
37921
26421
21841
28271
21381
36811
41001

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleClientExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
19117843 ELECTRONICALLY GUIDED PRECISION MEDICAL TARGETING USING NEAR INFRARED FLUORESCENCE IMAGING Johnson & Johnson Enterprise Innovation Inc. SEBASTIAN, KAITLYN E 3797 §101§102§103§112 Final Rejection — Pending Apr 02, 2025
19054751 OVERLAYING CONTENT AUGMENTING VIDEO DATA FROM A CONTENT PROVIDER SYSTEM DISPLAYED BY A CLIENT DEVICE Super Streaming Tech Inc. TELAN, MICHAEL R 2426 §102§103 Non-Final OA 28d Pending Feb 14, 2025
19039634 MULTI-MODAL PROGRAMMABLE SOUND-RESPONSIVE LIGHTING UNIT AND APPLICATION Varsity Music, Inc. CHAI, RAYMOND REI-YANG 2844 §103 Final Rejection — Pending Jan 28, 2025
18968990 SHIFT COMPLIANCE MANAGEMENT SYSTEM FOR PREVENTING PRESSURE ULCERS Hipr Innovation, Inc. MOSS, JAMES R 3792 §101§103§112 Non-Final OA — Pending Dec 04, 2024
18869501 3D MEMORY DEVICE WITH LOCAL COLUMN DECODING Rambus Inc. RADKE, JAY W §112 Non-Final OA — Pending Nov 26, 2024
18938112 LEVERAGING A LARGE LANGUAGE MODEL FOR UNIVERSAL DISPATCH MESSAGING Tango Tango, Inc. MIAH, LITON 2642 §103 Non-Final OA — Pending Nov 05, 2024
18919179 FOLDED MEMORY MODULES Rambus Inc. HASSAN, AURANGZEB 2184 §103 Final Rejection — Pending Oct 17, 2024
18895130 DATA BUFFER FOR MEMORY DEVICES WITH MEMORY ADDRESS REMAPPING Rambus Inc. PHAM, LY D 2827 §102§103 Final Rejection — Pending Sep 24, 2024
18786296 CONTEXT-BASED COMPRESSION IN A MEMORY SYSTEM Rambus Inc. KROFCHECK, MICHAEL C 2138 §103§112 Non-Final OA — Pending Jul 26, 2024
18752571 PLATFORM FOR MANAGING CONTEXTUAL AVAILABILITY OF ELECTRONIC HEALTH DATA Janssen Research & Development, LLC VAN DUZER, ALEXIS KIM 3681 §101§102§103 Non-Final OA 60d overdue Pending Jun 24, 2024
18666621 ENEMA DELIVERY DEVICE FOR PEOPLE WITH IMPAIRED MOBILITY Enable Independence, LLC VOKES, KATHLEEN PAIGE §102§103§112 Non-Final OA — Pending May 16, 2024
18644896 CELL MANUFACTURING MANAGEMENT PLATFORM USING MACHINE LEARNING Janssen Research & Development, LLC PEACH, POLINA G 4100 §101§103 Non-Final OA — Pending Apr 24, 2024
18701574 STACKED MEMORY DEVICE WITH INTERFACE DIE Rambus Inc. BELKHAYAT, ZAKARIA MOHAMMED 2139 §103 Final Rejection 33d Pending Apr 15, 2024
18693084 Automatic Estimation of Ulcerative Colitis Severity from Endoscopy Videos USING ORDINAL MULTI-INSTANCE LEARNING Janssen Research & Development, LLC MAHROUKA, WASSIM 2665 §102§103 Non-Final OA — Pending Mar 18, 2024
18602996 FLOATING WIND POWER GENERATION PLATFORM FOR OFFSHORE DEPLOYMENT Hiseas Energy Inc. PAULSON, SHEETAL R. 3615 §102 Non-Final OA — Pending Mar 12, 2024
18591463 Sharpening Parameter And Determination System For A Lawn Mower Blade Sharpening And Task Robot Orbisharp Robotics, Inc. RIVERA, CARLOS A 3723 §101§102§103§112Other Non-Final OA — Pending Feb 29, 2024
18538785 STRESS PERFORMANCE TRAINING SYSTEM Neurosmart Inc. TOTH, KAREN E 3791 §101 Final Rejection — Pending Dec 13, 2023
18488744 REMEDIATION OF CONTAINERIZED WORKLOADS BASED ON CONTEXT BREACH AT EDGE DEVICES Velocloud Networks, LLC KIM, HEE SOO 2443 §103 Final Rejection 8d Pending Oct 17, 2023
18454998 TISSUE CLASSIFICATION SYSTEM FOR DETECTING CANCEROUS CELLS Johnson & Johnson Enterprise Innovation Inc. STIGELL, THEODORE J 3783 §102§103§112 Non-Final OA — Pending Aug 24, 2023

Managing Amsel Ip Law's Patent Prosecution?

IP Author helps law firms respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month