Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 04, 2026

Potomac Law Group, Pllc - AB Sciex

Technology area: Semiconductors, Circuits & Optics

14 pending office actions • 1 client • 10 examiners • 3 art units • 0 of 14 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 17 patents granted in the last 365 days

Analysis

Potomac Law Group, PLLC - AB Sciex focuses its prosecution efforts in the Semiconductors, Circuits & Optics technology area. With 141 career applications, the firm has achieved a resolved allowance rate pct of 92.0. This performance indicates a strong proficiency in securing patent protections within this technical domain.

The firm maintains an efficient prosecution timeline, averaging 1.57 office actions per allowance. This low average suggests that applications are often resolved quickly, minimizing the time spent on protracted negotiations. There are currently 7 pending office actions, which represents a manageable active workload relative to the 141 career applications handled by the firm.

The resolved allowance rate pct of 92.0 demonstrates a high level of success in obtaining grants. When paired with the 1.57 average office actions per allowance, the data suggests a streamlined strategy for the Semiconductors, Circuits & Optics sector. This profile reflects a focused and effective prosecution practice that balances success rates with efficient processing times.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Quality Metrics (n=141 apps, methodology: how we score firms)

91.8%
Allowance Rate
n=141
+0.55σ
Allowance Rate (norm)
n=141
1.6
OAs to Allowance
n=45
-0.96σ
OAs to Allow (norm)
n=45
1087 days
Time to Allowance
n=45
-35.4pp
Interview Lift
n=141
32.6%
RCE Rate
n=141
0.0%
Appeal Rate
n=141

Rejection Performance (% of received rejections ultimately overcome)

—
§101 Overcome
n=6 (min 20)
44.4%
§102 Overcome
n=27
39.5%
§103 Overcome
n=38
48.3%
§112 Overcome
n=29

Specialization & Scale

H01J, G01N, G16C
Top CPC Subclasses
83%
Top-3 CPC Share
n=141
0
Practitioners
n=141
—
Apps / Practitioner
n=141 (min 20)

Portfolio Summary

14
Total Pending OAs
10
Non-Final OAs
4
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 3 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

0
Overdue
1
Due this week
2
Due this month
0
Due in next 60 days
0
Due later

Deadline Fire Line

Every pending office action with a known statutory deadline, placed on a days-until-due axis. Dots left of Today are overdue; the further right, the more runway. Cases that share a deadline window stack vertically. 3 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date.

-30dToday30d60d90d120d
Due ≤ 7 days (1)Due ≤ 30 days (2)

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

10
Hard (71%)
4
Medium (29%)
0
Easy (0%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§101 + other4 (29%)
§103 only3 (21%)
§102 only1 (7%)
Multi-statute (no §101)6 (43%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

1
Life Sciences
7% of docket
0
Information Tech
0% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
8
Semiconductors
57% of docket
0
Mechanical / Eng
0% of docket
5
Business / Other
36% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

140 h
Manual time on pending OAs
28 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
49 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
1.2 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
WANG, JING 3 100.0% +0.0%
SMITH, DAVID E 2 85.2% +7.0%
OSENBAUGH-STEWART, ELIZA W 2 73.0% +16.7%
GOURLIE, LAURA ELOISE 1 64.4% +38.8%
GASSEN, CHRISTOPHER J 1 79.6% +25.0%
KALISZEWSKI, ALINA ROSE 1 84.4% +23.8%
BERA, HENA RAKESHKUMAR 1 — —
MCCORMACK, JASON L 1 84.6% +8.1%
HAQ, SHAFIQUL 1 64.8% +55.2%
CHANG, HANWAY 1 86.1% +7.7%

Quick Wins (3)

Cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate of 80%+ where the difficulty is Easy or Medium. The top 3 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18280542 Bifurcated Mass Spectrometer CHANG, HANWAY 22d
18707137 Ion Optical Elements and Methods of Manufacturing the Same KALISZEWSKI, ALINA ROSE —
18283318 Differential Mobility Spectrometer/Mass Spectrometer Interface With Greater Than 10 L/Min Transport Gas Flow SMITH, DAVID E —

Hard Cases (10)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 8 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18569773 Internal Fragment Reduction in Top Down ECD Analysis of Proteins MCCORMACK, JASON L 6d
18696002 Laser Induced Fragmentation for MRM Analysis WANG, JING 19d
18858565 Pseudo MS3 Strategy Employing PTR for Labelled Quantitative Proteomics WANG, JING —
18857662 Detection Saturation Correction and De-Coalescence by Ion Beam Modulation GOURLIE, LAURA ELOISE —
18856903 High-Throughput Analysis Using Ion Mobility and Mass Spectroscopy SMITH, DAVID E —
18722148 Natural Isotopologues Based-Mass Spectrometer Calibration GASSEN, CHRISTOPHER J —
18711346 Method for Noise Reduction and Ion Rate Estimation Using an Analog Detection System WANG, JING —
18577407 SCOUT MRM FOR SCREENING AND DIAGNOSTIC ASSAYS BERA, HENA RAKESHKUMAR —

Interview Candidates (6)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 6 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18857662 Detection Saturation Correction and De-Coalescence by Ion Beam Modulation GOURLIE, LAURA ELOISE —
18722148 Natural Isotopologues Based-Mass Spectrometer Calibration GASSEN, CHRISTOPHER J —
18707137 Ion Optical Elements and Methods of Manufacturing the Same KALISZEWSKI, ALINA ROSE —
18702003 Methods and Systems for Simultaneously Generating Differential Mobility Spectrometry-Ms and -Ms/Ms Data OSENBAUGH-STEWART, ELIZA W —
18569781 Electron-Based Fragmentation Method OSENBAUGH-STEWART, ELIZA W —
18286942 Native Fluorescence Detection for Protein Analysis in Capillary Electrophoresis HAQ, SHAFIQUL —

Client Portfolio (1 client)

Client (Assignee)Pending OAs
DH TECHNOLOGIES DEVELOPMENT PTE. LTD. 14

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
28817
16781
28781

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleClientExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
18858565 Pseudo MS3 Strategy Employing PTR for Labelled Quantitative Proteomics DH TECHNOLOGIES DEVELOPMENT PTE. LTD. WANG, JING §102§103§112 Non-Final OA — Pending Oct 21, 2024
18857662 Detection Saturation Correction and De-Coalescence by Ion Beam Modulation DH TECHNOLOGIES DEVELOPMENT PTE. LTD. GOURLIE, LAURA ELOISE §101§102§103§112 Non-Final OA — Pending Oct 17, 2024
18856903 High-Throughput Analysis Using Ion Mobility and Mass Spectroscopy DH TECHNOLOGIES DEVELOPMENT PTE. LTD. SMITH, DAVID E §103§112 Non-Final OA — Pending Oct 15, 2024
18722148 Natural Isotopologues Based-Mass Spectrometer Calibration DH TECHNOLOGIES DEVELOPMENT PTE. LTD. GASSEN, CHRISTOPHER J §101§102§103§112 Non-Final OA — Pending Jun 20, 2024
18711346 Method for Noise Reduction and Ion Rate Estimation Using an Analog Detection System DH TECHNOLOGIES DEVELOPMENT PTE. LTD. WANG, JING 2881 §101§103§112 Non-Final OA — Pending May 17, 2024
18707137 Ion Optical Elements and Methods of Manufacturing the Same DH TECHNOLOGIES DEVELOPMENT PTE. LTD. KALISZEWSKI, ALINA ROSE 2881 §103 Non-Final OA — Pending May 02, 2024
18702003 Methods and Systems for Simultaneously Generating Differential Mobility Spectrometry-Ms and -Ms/Ms Data DH TECHNOLOGIES DEVELOPMENT PTE. LTD. OSENBAUGH-STEWART, ELIZA W 2881 §103 Final Rejection — Pending Apr 17, 2024
18696002 Laser Induced Fragmentation for MRM Analysis DH TECHNOLOGIES DEVELOPMENT PTE. LTD. WANG, JING 2881 §102§103§112 Final Rejection 19d Pending Mar 27, 2024
18577407 SCOUT MRM FOR SCREENING AND DIAGNOSTIC ASSAYS DH TECHNOLOGIES DEVELOPMENT PTE. LTD. BERA, HENA RAKESHKUMAR §101§102§103§112Other Non-Final OA — Pending Jan 08, 2024
18569781 Electron-Based Fragmentation Method DH TECHNOLOGIES DEVELOPMENT PTE. LTD. OSENBAUGH-STEWART, ELIZA W 2881 §102§103 Final Rejection — Pending Dec 13, 2023
18569773 Internal Fragment Reduction in Top Down ECD Analysis of Proteins DH TECHNOLOGIES DEVELOPMENT PTE. LTD. MCCORMACK, JASON L 2881 §102§103 Final Rejection 6d Pending Dec 13, 2023
18286942 Native Fluorescence Detection for Protein Analysis in Capillary Electrophoresis DH TECHNOLOGIES DEVELOPMENT PTE. LTD. HAQ, SHAFIQUL 1678 §103§112 Non-Final OA — Pending Oct 13, 2023
18283318 Differential Mobility Spectrometer/Mass Spectrometer Interface With Greater Than 10 L/Min Transport Gas Flow DH TECHNOLOGIES DEVELOPMENT PTE. LTD. SMITH, DAVID E 2881 §103 Non-Final OA — Pending Sep 21, 2023
18280542 Bifurcated Mass Spectrometer DH TECHNOLOGIES DEVELOPMENT PTE. LTD. CHANG, HANWAY 2878 §102 Non-Final OA 22d Pending Sep 06, 2023

Managing Potomac Law Group, Pllc - AB Sciex's Patent Prosecution?

IP Author helps law firms respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month