Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 02, 2026

Examiner: NADKARNI, SARVESH J

Tech Center 3700 • Art Units: 2619 2621 2623 2629 2695 3784

This examiner grants 73% of resolved cases

Analysis

Sarvesh J. Nadkarni operates in Tech Center 3700 and Art Unit 2619. He has a substantial track record with 521 resolved cases. His allowance rate is 72.7 percent, which is quite high and suggests a favorable environment for applicants. This 72.7 percent rate indicates that the majority of applications reaching a final resolution under his review are successfully granted in Art Unit 2619.

Interviews appear to be a beneficial part of the process with Nadkarni. He has an interview lift of 14.1 percent. This 14.1 percent lift suggests that direct communication can help bridge gaps in understanding and lead to a higher probability of allowance. Practitioners should utilize this 14.1 percent lift to their advantage, especially in cases where written arguments may not be sufficient to overcome rejections.

The median days to allowance for this examiner is 1060. This 1060-day median represents the typical duration from filing to grant. With 521 resolved cases already completed, this 1060-day figure is a reliable indicator of the expected pace of prosecution. Applicants should plan for a timeline of approximately 1060 days, while leveraging the 14.1 percent interview lift to improve their chances of a positive outcome under Nadkarni's supervision.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Performance Statistics

72.7%
Allow Rate
+2.7% vs TC avg
543
Total Applications
+14.1%
Interview Lift
1060
Avg Prosecution Days
Based on 521 resolved cases, 2023–2026

Rejection Statute Breakdown

1.4%
§101 Eligibility
10.5%
§102 Novelty
74.3%
§103 Obviousness
11.2%
§112 Clarity

Currently Pending Office Actions

App #TitleStatusAssignee
19223866 IMAGE MIRRORING SYSTEM AND METHOD Final Rejection Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.
18596087 ELECTRONIC DEVICE WHICH PROVIDES USER EXPERIENCE FOR CONTROLLING AT LEAST ONE ULTRA-WIDEBAND DEVICE, AND CONTROL METHOD THEREFOR Final Rejection Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.
18750769 Displaying Representations of Environments Final Rejection Apple Inc.
19428933 DISPLAY DEVICE AND ELECTRONIC DEVICE INCLUDING THE SAME Non-Final OA SAMSUNG DISPLAY CO., LTD.
19366839 PIXEL CIRCUIT, DISPLAY DEVICE INCLUDING THE PIXEL CIRCUIT AND ELECTRONIC DEVICE INCLUDING THE PIXEL CIRCUIT Non-Final OA Samsung Display Co., LTD.
19069194 DISPLAY DEVICE Final Rejection SAMSUNG DISPLAY CO., LTD.
18924051 INPUT SENSING PART AND DISPLAY DEVICE INCLUDING THE SAME Final Rejection Samsung Display Co., Ltd.
19452608 PERSONALIZED CALIBRATION OF USER INTERFACES Non-Final OA Snap Inc.
19220006 Display Device Non-Final OA LG Display Co., Ltd.
19311549 ELECTRONIC DEVICE Non-Final OA InnoLux Corporation
19220726 METHOD FOR INTERACTING WITH A VIRTUAL OBJECT, PROGRAM USING SAME, AND IMMERSIVE REALITY DEVICE Final Rejection ORANGE
18604424 EASY-TO-REMEMBER INTERACTION MODEL USING IN-AIR HAND GESTURES TO CONTROL ARTIFICIAL-REALITY HEADSETS, AND METHODS OF USE THEREOF Non-Final OA Meta Platforms Technologies, LLC
19220128 DISPLAY PANEL AND COMPENSATION METHOD THEREFOR Final Rejection Shenzhen China Star Optoelectronics Semiconductor Display Technology Co., Ltd.

Facing This Examiner?

IP Author analyzes examiner patterns and generates tailored response strategies with the highest chance of allowance.

Build Your Strategy

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month