Prosecution Insights
Last updated: August 06, 2026

Nields, Lemack & Frame, LLC - Varian

10 pending office actions • 1 client • 9 examiners • 5 art units • 0 of 10 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 19 patents granted in the last 365 days

Quality Metrics (n=278 apps, methodology: how we score firms)

97.0%
Allowance Rate
n=278
+0.69σ
Allowance Rate (norm)
n=278
2.7
OAs to Allowance
n=223
-0.51σ
OAs to Allow (norm)
n=223
846 days
Time to Allowance
n=223
-4.1pp
Interview Lift
n=278
24.4%
RCE Rate
n=278
0.5%
Appeal Rate
n=278

Rejection Performance (% of received rejections ultimately overcome)

§101 Overcome
n=2 (min 20)
85.0%
§102 Overcome
n=93
85.1%
§103 Overcome
n=161
82.1%
§112 Overcome
n=67

Specialization & Scale

H01J, H01L, H10P
Top CPC Subclasses
63%
Top-3 CPC Share
n=278
0
Practitioners
n=278
Apps / Practitioner
n=278 (min 20)

Portfolio Summary

10
Total Pending OAs
9
Non-Final OAs
1
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 2 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

1
Overdue
0
Due this week
0
Due this month
0
Due in next 60 days
1
Due later

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

4
Hard (40%)
5
Medium (50%)
1
Easy (10%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§103 only5 (50%)
§112 only1 (10%)
Multi-statute (no §101)4 (40%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

2
Life Sciences
20% of docket
0
Information Tech
0% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
7
Semiconductors
70% of docket
0
Mechanical / Eng
0% of docket
1
Business / Other
10% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

100 h
Manual time on pending OAs
20 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
35 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.9 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
TANDY, LAURA ELOISE 2 65.5% +38.3%
VANORE, DAVID A 1 88.9% +7.4%
CHANG, HANWAY 1 85.8% +7.9%
SMITH, DAVID E 1 85.1% +7.1%
VAUGHAN, JASON L 1 78.7% +20.2%
WANG, JING 1 100.0% +0.0%
LOGIE, MICHAEL J 1 63.7% +9.4%
NUCKOLS, TIFFANY Z 1 44.5% +39.8%
STOFFA, WYATT A 1 79.5% +23.1%

Quick Wins (3)

Cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate of 80%+ where the difficulty is Easy or Medium. The top 3 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18769008 THERMALLY OPTIMIZED EXTRACTION PLATE FOR ION IMPLANTER VANORE, DAVID A
18597210 Heated Dynamic Seal Rotary Union for Delivery of Cryogenic Fluid SMITH, DAVID E
18542905 Natural Frequency Adjuster For Extraction Electrodes WANG, JING

Hard Cases (4)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 4 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18441483 THERMOELECTRIC CONTROL FOR A CRUCIBLE FOR USE WITH AN ION SOURCE TANDY, LAURA ELOISE 75d
18626895 Semiconductor Processing System with Horizontal Scan CHANG, HANWAY
18392246 Workpiece Support For Backside Processing Using Edge Grip VAUGHAN, JASON L
18387987 XRAY DIFFRACTION ANGLE VERIFICATION IN AN ION IMPLANTER LOGIE, MICHAEL J

Interview Candidates (5)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 5 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18107819 System and Method for Reducing Particle Formation in a Process Chamber of an Ion Implanter TANDY, LAURA ELOISE 43d overdue
18441483 THERMOELECTRIC CONTROL FOR A CRUCIBLE FOR USE WITH AN ION SOURCE TANDY, LAURA ELOISE 75d
18392246 Workpiece Support For Backside Processing Using Edge Grip VAUGHAN, JASON L
18370155 PLASMA SOURCE WITH MULTIPLE EXTRACTION APERTURES NUCKOLS, TIFFANY Z
17740848 HYBRID ION SOURCE FOR ALUMINUM ION GENERATION USING A TARGET HOLDER AND ORGANOALUMINIUM COMPOUNDS STOFFA, WYATT A

Client Portfolio (1 client)

Client (Assignee)Pending OAs
Applied Materials 10

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
28814
28782
17171
17161
28001

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleClientExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
18769008 THERMALLY OPTIMIZED EXTRACTION PLATE FOR ION IMPLANTER Applied Materials, Inc. VANORE, DAVID A 2878 §112 Non-Final OA Pending Jul 10, 2024
18626895 Semiconductor Processing System with Horizontal Scan Applied Materials, Inc. CHANG, HANWAY 2878 §102§103 Non-Final OA Pending Apr 04, 2024
18597210 Heated Dynamic Seal Rotary Union for Delivery of Cryogenic Fluid Applied Materials, Inc. SMITH, DAVID E §103Other Non-Final OA Pending Mar 06, 2024
18441483 THERMOELECTRIC CONTROL FOR A CRUCIBLE FOR USE WITH AN ION SOURCE Applied Materials, Inc. TANDY, LAURA ELOISE 2881 §102§103 Non-Final OA 75d Pending Feb 14, 2024
18392246 Workpiece Support For Backside Processing Using Edge Grip Applied Materials, Inc. VAUGHAN, JASON L 1717 §102§103 Non-Final OA Pending Dec 21, 2023
18542905 Natural Frequency Adjuster For Extraction Electrodes Applied Materials, Inc. WANG, JING 2881 §103 Non-Final OA Pending Dec 18, 2023
18387987 XRAY DIFFRACTION ANGLE VERIFICATION IN AN ION IMPLANTER Applied Materials, Inc. LOGIE, MICHAEL J 2881 §103§112 Non-Final OA Pending Nov 08, 2023
18370155 PLASMA SOURCE WITH MULTIPLE EXTRACTION APERTURES Applied Materials, Inc. NUCKOLS, TIFFANY Z 1716 §103 Non-Final OA Pending Sep 19, 2023
18107819 System and Method for Reducing Particle Formation in a Process Chamber of an Ion Implanter Applied Materials, Inc. TANDY, LAURA ELOISE 2881 §103 Final Rejection 43d overdue Pending Feb 09, 2023
17740848 HYBRID ION SOURCE FOR ALUMINUM ION GENERATION USING A TARGET HOLDER AND ORGANOALUMINIUM COMPOUNDS Applied Materials, Inc. STOFFA, WYATT A 2800 §103 Non-Final OA Pending May 10, 2022

Managing Nields, Lemack & Frame, LLC - Varian's Patent Prosecution?

IP Author helps law firms respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month