Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 04, 2026

Shackelford, Mckinley & Norton, LLP

Technology areas: Semiconductors, Circuits & Optics • Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems

15 pending office actions • 9 clients • 14 examiners • 10 art units • 0 of 15 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready

Analysis

Shackelford, McKinley & Norton, LLP focuses on the Semiconductors, Circuits & Optics technology area, with 1097 career applications. The firm has a resolved allowance rate pct of 84.73. There are 14 pending office actions currently being handled. The 1097 career applications show the firm's experience in this technical domain.

The average office actions per allowance for this firm is 3.05. This metric helps practitioners understand the typical number of interactions with the patent office required to reach an allowance in Semiconductors, Circuits & Optics. The 84.73 resolved allowance rate pct is a key indicator of the firm's effectiveness in securing patent rights. With 14 pending office actions, the firm continues its work in this specialized field. These statistics provide a data-driven summary of the firm's historical performance and current activity.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Quality Metrics (n=1097 apps, methodology: how we score firms)

84.7%
Allowance Rate
n=1097
+0.53σ
Allowance Rate (norm)
n=1097
3.0
OAs to Allowance
n=494
-0.34σ
OAs to Allow (norm)
n=494
1045 days
Time to Allowance
n=494
+14.4pp
Interview Lift
n=1097
28.1%
RCE Rate
n=1097
1.4%
Appeal Rate
n=1097

Rejection Performance (% of received rejections ultimately overcome)

50.9%
§101 Overcome
n=57
67.9%
§102 Overcome
n=287
67.9%
§103 Overcome
n=458
67.3%
§112 Overcome
n=321

Specialization & Scale

G01N, A61K, H01L
Top CPC Subclasses
13%
Top-3 CPC Share
n=1097
0
Practitioners
n=1097
—
Apps / Practitioner
n=1097 (min 20)

Portfolio Summary

15
Total Pending OAs
7
Non-Final OAs
8
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 6 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

4
Overdue
0
Due this week
0
Due this month
2
Due in next 60 days
0
Due later

Deadline Fire Line

Every pending office action with a known statutory deadline, placed on a days-until-due axis. Dots left of Today are overdue; the further right, the more runway. Cases that share a deadline window stack vertically. 6 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date.

-30dToday30d60d90d120d
Overdue (4)Due ≤ 60 days (2)

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

12
Hard (80%)
3
Medium (20%)
0
Easy (0%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§101 + other1 (7%)
§103 only3 (20%)
Multi-statute (no §101)11 (73%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

3
Life Sciences
20% of docket
0
Information Tech
0% of docket
1
Communications
7% of docket
4
Semiconductors
27% of docket
4
Mechanical / Eng
27% of docket
3
Business / Other
20% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

150 h
Manual time on pending OAs
30 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
52 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
1.3 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
PETERSON, ERIK T 2 76.5% +11.0%
MCPHERSON, JAMES M 1 82.2% +17.3%
LAZO, THOMAS E 1 86.8% +8.9%
SHAH, UTPAL D 1 87.9% +11.3%
CUMBESS, YOLANDA RENEE 1 86.9% +8.5%
JOHNSON, CHRISTOPHER A 1 84.4% +8.2%
BERRO, ADAM JOSEPH 1 51.8% +45.2%
KOCH, GEORGE R 1 72.9% +17.3%
WALTER, AUDREY BRADLEY 1 80.9% +23.9%
DEMETER, HILINA K 1 72.1% +18.8%

Quick Wins (1)

Cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate of 80%+ where the difficulty is Easy or Medium. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
19032386 GENERATING SAFEST ROUTE BASED ON ROAD NETWORK CHARACTERISTICS AND OPERATIONAL MEASURES MCPHERSON, JAMES M —

Hard Cases (12)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 8 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18696620 TOOL AND PROCESSES FOR PICK-AND-PLACE ASSEMBLY KOCH, GEORGE R 126d overdue
18010456 PROCESSES AND APPLICATIONS FOR CATALYST INFLUENCED CHEMICAL ETCHING PETERSON, ERIK T 84d overdue
17925490 HIGH PRECISION NANOSCALE THIN FILM FABRICATION PROCESSES ROLLAND, ALEX A 72d overdue
17965436 MODULATING STRESS RESPONSES BY A NOVEL CHROMATIN-ASSOCIATED GUIDE RNA DERIVED FROM TRANSFER RNA KINGDON, CATHY 24d overdue
18399150 DYNAMIC BASKETBALL GAME SYSTEM AND METHOD WALTER, AUDREY BRADLEY 33d
18865042 RECONFIGURABLE WORKSPACE SOFT GRIPPER LAZO, THOMAS E —
18911537 EMOTION PORTRAYAL DATABASE SHAH, UTPAL D —
18729159 SCRAP DATA ANALYSIS CUMBESS, YOLANDA RENEE —

Interview Candidates (8)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 8 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18696620 TOOL AND PROCESSES FOR PICK-AND-PLACE ASSEMBLY KOCH, GEORGE R 126d overdue
18010456 PROCESSES AND APPLICATIONS FOR CATALYST INFLUENCED CHEMICAL ETCHING PETERSON, ERIK T 84d overdue
18399150 DYNAMIC BASKETBALL GAME SYSTEM AND METHOD WALTER, AUDREY BRADLEY 33d
18510891 AUTOMATED HUMAN MESH AND SKELETON GENERATION AND ANIMATION APPARATUS, SYSTEM, AND METHOD DEMETER, HILINA K 57d
19032386 GENERATING SAFEST ROUTE BASED ON ROAD NETWORK CHARACTERISTICS AND OPERATIONAL MEASURES MCPHERSON, JAMES M —
18911537 EMOTION PORTRAYAL DATABASE SHAH, UTPAL D —
18708316 POLYMERIC FLAME RETARDANT SYNERGIST AND THE METHOD OF PRODUCING IT AND ITS FORMULATION FOR POLYAMIDES BERRO, ADAM JOSEPH —
18132324 PROCESSES AND APPLICATIONS FOR CATALYST INFLUENCED CHEMICAL ETCHING PETERSON, ERIK T —

Client Portfolio (9 clients)

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
36512
28982
36631
17451
37111
26171
17591
28971
16631
28721

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleClientExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
19032386 GENERATING SAFEST ROUTE BASED ON ROAD NETWORK CHARACTERISTICS AND OPERATIONAL MEASURES Texas State University MCPHERSON, JAMES M 3663 §103 Final Rejection — Pending Jan 20, 2025
18865042 RECONFIGURABLE WORKSPACE SOFT GRIPPER Singapore University Of Technology And Design LAZO, THOMAS E 3651 §102§103 Non-Final OA — Pending Nov 12, 2024
18911537 EMOTION PORTRAYAL DATABASE Texas State University SHAH, UTPAL D §101§103 Non-Final OA — Pending Oct 10, 2024
18729159 SCRAP DATA ANALYSIS Sortera Technologies Inc. CUMBESS, YOLANDA RENEE 3651 §103§112 Non-Final OA — Pending Jul 15, 2024
18728885 HIGH-PRECISION HETEROGENEOUS INTEGRATION BOARD OF REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS SYSTEM JOHNSON, CHRISTOPHER A §102§103§112 Non-Final OA — Pending Jul 14, 2024
18708316 POLYMERIC FLAME RETARDANT SYNERGIST AND THE METHOD OF PRODUCING IT AND ITS FORMULATION FOR POLYAMIDES Agency for Science, Technology and Research BERRO, ADAM JOSEPH §103§112 Non-Final OA — Pending May 08, 2024
18696620 TOOL AND PROCESSES FOR PICK-AND-PLACE ASSEMBLY BOARD OF REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS SYSTEM KOCH, GEORGE R 1745 §103§112 Final Rejection 126d overdue Pending Mar 28, 2024
18399150 DYNAMIC BASKETBALL GAME SYSTEM AND METHOD Jumpshot Inc. WALTER, AUDREY BRADLEY 3711 §103§112 Final Rejection 33d Pending Dec 28, 2023
18510891 AUTOMATED HUMAN MESH AND SKELETON GENERATION AND ANIMATION APPARATUS, SYSTEM, AND METHOD Groove Jones, LLC DEMETER, HILINA K 2617 §103 Final Rejection 57d Pending Nov 16, 2023
18132324 PROCESSES AND APPLICATIONS FOR CATALYST INFLUENCED CHEMICAL ETCHING BOARD OF REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS SYSTEM PETERSON, ERIK T 2898 §102§103§112 Non-Final OA — Pending Apr 07, 2023
18010456 PROCESSES AND APPLICATIONS FOR CATALYST INFLUENCED CHEMICAL ETCHING BOARD OF REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS SYSTEM PETERSON, ERIK T 2898 §102§112 Final Rejection 84d overdue Pending Dec 15, 2022
17925490 HIGH PRECISION NANOSCALE THIN FILM FABRICATION PROCESSES Sds Nano, Inc. ROLLAND, ALEX A 1759 §103§112 Final Rejection 72d overdue Pending Nov 15, 2022
17923473 NANOFABRICATION OF COLLAPSE-FREE HIGH ASPECT RATIO NANOSTRUCTURES BOARD OF REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS SYSTEM KIM, JAHAE 2897 §102§103§112 Non-Final OA — Pending Nov 04, 2022
17965436 MODULATING STRESS RESPONSES BY A NOVEL CHROMATIN-ASSOCIATED GUIDE RNA DERIVED FROM TRANSFER RNA Texas State University KINGDON, CATHY 1663 §102§103§112 Final Rejection 24d overdue Pending Oct 13, 2022
17789166 OPTICAL SYSTEM AND METHOD OF FORMING THE SAME AMS-OSRAM AG JORDAN, DANIEL JEFFERY 2872 §103 Final Rejection — Pending Jun 24, 2022

Managing Shackelford, Mckinley & Norton, LLP's Patent Prosecution?

IP Author helps law firms respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month