Prosecution Insights
Last updated: May 29, 2026

Kaplan Breyer Schwarz, LLP

10 pending office actions • 6 clients • 10 examiners • 9 art units • 0 of 10 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 26 patents granted in the last 365 days

Portfolio Summary

10
Total Pending OAs
7
Non-Final OAs
3
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 10 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

4
Overdue
2
Due this week
3
Due this month
0
Due in next 60 days
1
Due later

Deadline Fire Line

Every pending office action with a known statutory deadline, placed on a days-until-due axis. Dots left of Today are overdue; the further right, the more runway. Cases that share a deadline window stack vertically. 10 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date.

-30dToday30d60d90d120d
Overdue (4)Due ≤ 7 days (2)Due ≤ 30 days (3)Due later (1)

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

0
Hard (0%)
9
Medium (90%)
1
Easy (10%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§103 only9 (90%)
§112 only1 (10%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

5
Life Sciences
50% of docket
0
Information Tech
0% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
3
Semiconductors
30% of docket
2
Mechanical / Eng
20% of docket
0
Business / Other
0% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

100 h
Manual time on pending OAs
20 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
35 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.9 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
RADKOWSKI, PETER 1 76.0% +8.4%
HORIKOSHI, STEVEN Y 1 59.4% +14.9%
CROWELL, ANNA M 1 44.8% +30.8%
MOORE, KARLA A 1 43.1% +14.5%
NGUYEN, THUKHANH T 1 74.4% +10.9%
TORRES WILLIAMS, MELANIE 1 84.7% +11.4%
MELLOTT, JAMES M 1 49.8% +46.6%
GALT, CASSI J 1 68.9% +16.1%
MATA, SARA M 1 66.7% +21.3%
GERIDO, DWAN A 1 57.7% +30.9%

Quick Wins (1)

Cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate of 80%+ where the difficulty is Easy or Medium. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18138271 Composite Wave Springs TORRES WILLIAMS, MELANIE 71d overdue

Interview Candidates (9)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 8 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18138271 Composite Wave Springs TORRES WILLIAMS, MELANIE 71d overdue
18236243 Rigid Sapphire Based Direct Patterning Deposition Mask CROWELL, ANNA M 45d overdue
18201503 METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR INJECTION-COMPRESSION MOLDING NGUYEN, THUKHANH T 26d overdue
18096497 Piezo-Elements for Wearable Devices MATA, SARA M 15d overdue
18376959 Tandem OLED with Intermediate Alloy Layer HORIKOSHI, STEVEN Y 6d
17984177 System for Optically Analyzing a Test Sample and Method Therefor GERIDO, DWAN A 6d
18113529 METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR RAPID LOCATION OF DATA ACQUISITION DEVICES GALT, CASSI J 12d
18229676 EVAPORATION SYSTEM HAVING IMPROVED COLLIMATION MOORE, KARLA A 16d

Client Portfolio (6 clients)

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
17162
28741
28751
17431
36161
17591
36481
28371
17971

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleClientExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
18440149 Contradirectional-Filter Architecture Having Low Back-Reflection Quintessent Inc. RADKOWSKI, PETER 2874 §103 Non-Final OA 22d Pending Feb 13, 2024
18376959 Tandem OLED with Intermediate Alloy Layer Emagin Corporation HORIKOSHI, STEVEN Y 2875 §103 Non-Final OA 6d Pending Oct 05, 2023
18236243 Rigid Sapphire Based Direct Patterning Deposition Mask Emagin Corporation CROWELL, ANNA M 1716 §103 Non-Final OA 45d overdue Pending Aug 21, 2023
18229676 EVAPORATION SYSTEM HAVING IMPROVED COLLIMATION Emagin Corporation MOORE, KARLA A 1716 §103 Non-Final OA 16d Pending Aug 03, 2023
18201503 METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR INJECTION-COMPRESSION MOLDING Arris Composites Inc. NGUYEN, THUKHANH T 1743 §103 Final Rejection 26d overdue Pending May 24, 2023
18138271 Composite Wave Springs Arris Composites Inc. TORRES WILLIAMS, MELANIE 3616 §103 Non-Final OA 71d overdue Pending Apr 24, 2023
18134295 Non-Uniform-Thickness Layers and Methods for Forming California Institute Of Technology MELLOTT, JAMES M 1759 §103 Final Rejection 61d Pending Apr 13, 2023
18113529 METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR RAPID LOCATION OF DATA ACQUISITION DEVICES Thinaer, Inc. GALT, CASSI J 3648 §112 Final Rejection 12d Pending Feb 23, 2023
18096497 Piezo-Elements for Wearable Devices Inviza LLC MATA, SARA M 2837 §103 Non-Final OA 15d overdue Pending Jan 12, 2023
17984177 System for Optically Analyzing a Test Sample and Method Therefor California Institute Of Technology GERIDO, DWAN A 1797 §103 Non-Final OA 6d Pending Nov 09, 2022

Managing Kaplan Breyer Schwarz, LLP's Patent Prosecution?

IP Author helps law firms respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month