Prosecution Insights
Last updated: August 06, 2026

The Neudeck Law Firm

9 pending office actions • 2 clients • 9 examiners • 7 art units • 0 of 9 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 33 patents granted in the last 365 days

Quality Metrics (n=362 apps, methodology: how we score firms)

95.0%
Allowance Rate
n=362
+0.46σ
Allowance Rate (norm)
n=362
2.4
OAs to Allowance
n=115
-0.40σ
OAs to Allow (norm)
n=115
727 days
Time to Allowance
n=115
-14.6pp
Interview Lift
n=362
29.8%
RCE Rate
n=362
1.8%
Appeal Rate
n=362

Rejection Performance (% of received rejections ultimately overcome)

§101 Overcome
n=6 (min 20)
80.4%
§102 Overcome
n=51
75.0%
§103 Overcome
n=64
69.0%
§112 Overcome
n=29

Specialization & Scale

G06F, G11C, H04L
Top CPC Subclasses
70%
Top-3 CPC Share
n=362
0
Practitioners
n=362
Apps / Practitioner
n=362 (min 20)

Portfolio Summary

9
Total Pending OAs
7
Non-Final OAs
2
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 2 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

2
Overdue
0
Due this week
0
Due this month
0
Due in next 60 days
0
Due later

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

0
Hard (0%)
6
Medium (67%)
3
Easy (33%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§103 only5 (56%)
§102 only1 (11%)
§112 only2 (22%)
Double-patenting only1 (11%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

1
Life Sciences
11% of docket
5
Information Tech
56% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
1
Semiconductors
11% of docket
0
Mechanical / Eng
0% of docket
2
Business / Other
22% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

90 h
Manual time on pending OAs
18 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
31 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.8 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
DAVISON, CHARLOTTE INKERI 1 48.7% +20.8%
VERBRUGGE, KEVIN 1 88.8% -2.5%
HARRINGTON, CHERI L. 1 69.1% +26.7%
CHEN, XIAOCHUN L 1 91.9% -0.5%
CHASE, SHELLY A 1 94.7% +2.6%
PERRY, VICTOR NICHOLAS 1 100.0% +0.0%
NGUYEN, VAN THU T 1 82.8% +6.5%
THAMMAVONG, PRASITH 1 87.0% +7.8%
DARE, RYAN A 1 75.7% +7.3%

Quick Wins (6)

Cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate of 80%+ where the difficulty is Easy or Medium. The top 6 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18902067 MEMORY COMPONENT WITH ERROR-DETECT-CORRECT CODE INTERFACE PERRY, VICTOR NICHOLAS 71d overdue
18648969 COMMAND/ADDRESS CHANNEL ERROR DETECTION NGUYEN, VAN THU T 8d overdue
19231757 MEMORY SYSTEM WITH MULTIPLE OPEN ROWS PER BANK VERBRUGGE, KEVIN
18994560 MULTI-CHANNEL MEMORY STACK WITH SHARED DIE CHEN, XIAOCHUN L
19017200 CONTROLLER THAT RECEIVES A CYCLIC REDUNDANCY CHECK (CRC) CODE FOR BOTH READ AND WRITE DATA TRANSMITTED VIA BIDIRECTIONAL DATA LINK CHASE, SHELLY A
18598142 MEMORY DEVICE FLUSH BUFFER OPERATIONS THAMMAVONG, PRASITH

Interview Candidates (2)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 2 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
19411104 VAPORIZING DEVICE DAVISON, CHARLOTTE INKERI
19021723 DYNAMICALLY CHANGING DATA ACCESS BANDWIDTH BY SELECTIVELY ENABLING AND DISABLING DATA LINKS HARRINGTON, CHERI L.

Client Portfolio (2 clients)

Client (Assignee)Pending OAs
Rambus 8
Aether Innovations, LLC 1

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
17551
21391
21121
21111
28241
21371
21321

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleClientExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
19411104 VAPORIZING DEVICE Aether Innovations, LLC DAVISON, CHARLOTTE INKERI 1755 §103 Final Rejection Pending Dec 05, 2025
19231757 MEMORY SYSTEM WITH MULTIPLE OPEN ROWS PER BANK Rambus Inc. VERBRUGGE, KEVIN 2139 §102 Non-Final OA Pending Jun 09, 2025
19021723 DYNAMICALLY CHANGING DATA ACCESS BANDWIDTH BY SELECTIVELY ENABLING AND DISABLING DATA LINKS Rambus Inc. HARRINGTON, CHERI L. §103Other Non-Final OA Pending Jan 15, 2025
18994560 MULTI-CHANNEL MEMORY STACK WITH SHARED DIE Rambus Inc. CHEN, XIAOCHUN L §103 Non-Final OA Pending Jan 14, 2025
19017200 CONTROLLER THAT RECEIVES A CYCLIC REDUNDANCY CHECK (CRC) CODE FOR BOTH READ AND WRITE DATA TRANSMITTED VIA BIDIRECTIONAL DATA LINK Rambus Inc. CHASE, SHELLY A 2112 §112 Non-Final OA Pending Jan 10, 2025
18902067 MEMORY COMPONENT WITH ERROR-DETECT-CORRECT CODE INTERFACE Rambus Inc. PERRY, VICTOR NICHOLAS 2111 §103 Final Rejection 71d overdue Pending Sep 30, 2024
18648969 COMMAND/ADDRESS CHANNEL ERROR DETECTION Rambus Inc. NGUYEN, VAN THU T 2824 DP Non-Final OA 8d overdue Pending Apr 29, 2024
18598142 MEMORY DEVICE FLUSH BUFFER OPERATIONS Rambus Inc. THAMMAVONG, PRASITH 2137 §103 Non-Final OA Pending Mar 07, 2024
18687116 COMMON DATA STROBE AMONG MULTIPLE MEMORY DEVICES Rambus Inc. DARE, RYAN A 2132 §112 Non-Final OA Pending Feb 27, 2024

Managing The Neudeck Law Firm's Patent Prosecution?

IP Author helps law firms respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month