Prosecution Insights
Last updated: May 29, 2026

At&S Austria Technologie & Systemtechnik AG

9 pending office actions • 7 art units • 9 examiners • 0 of 9 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 6 patents granted in the last 365 days

Portfolio Summary

9
Total Pending OAs
5
Non-Final OAs
4
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 9 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

3
Overdue
0
Due this week
2
Due this month
2
Due in next 60 days
2
Due later

Deadline Fire Line

Every pending office action with a known statutory deadline, placed on a days-until-due axis. Dots left of Today are overdue; the further right, the more runway. Cases that share a deadline window stack vertically. 9 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date.

-30dToday30d60d90d120d
Overdue (3)Due ≤ 30 days (2)Due ≤ 60 days (2)Due later (2)

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

0
Hard (0%)
9
Medium (100%)
0
Easy (0%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§103 only9 (100%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

0
Life Sciences
0% of docket
0
Information Tech
0% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
9
Semiconductors
100% of docket
0
Mechanical / Eng
0% of docket
0
Business / Other
0% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

90 h
Manual time on pending OAs
18 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
31 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.8 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
AYCHILLHUM, ANDARGIE M 1 84.2% +14.8%
SAWYER, STEVEN T 1 72.3% +30.6%
VARGHESE, ROSHN K 1 66.9% +20.5%
CRITE, ANTONIO B 1 81.0% -13.0%
SHARMA, ADITYA 1 90.5% +15.4%
ALONZO MILLER, RHADAMES J 1 67.6% +3.9%
BARZYKIN, VICTOR V 1 81.9% +3.8%
CHAN, TSZFUNG JACKIE 1 75.3% +18.7%
TYNES JR., LAWRENCE C 1 85.1% +9.0%

Quick Wins (5)

Cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate of 80%+ where the difficulty is Easy or Medium. The top 5 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18479944 Package having component carrier with cavity and electronic component as well as functional filling medium therein CRITE, ANTONIO B 1d overdue
18253341 Component Carrier For Waveguide Applications SHARMA, ADITYA 12d
18193461 Component Carrier With Solder Mask Having Curved Sidewalls Interacting With Legend Marking BARZYKIN, VICTOR V 34d
18692075 Manufacturing a Component Carrier by a Nano Imprint Lithography Process AYCHILLHUM, ANDARGIE M 72d
18160406 Module Comprising a Semiconductor-based Component and Method of Manufacturing the Same TYNES JR., LAWRENCE C 75d

Interview Candidates (5)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 5 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18692032 Stamping Surface Profile in Design Layer and Filling an Indentation With Metallic Base Structure and Electroplating Structure SAWYER, STEVEN T 4d overdue
18253341 Component Carrier For Waveguide Applications SHARMA, ADITYA 12d
18182272 Inductor Inlay for a Component Carrier and a Method of Manufacturing the Same CHAN, TSZFUNG JACKIE 15d
18605509 Component Carrier With Continuously Extending Vertical Connection Structure, and Manufacturing Method VARGHESE, ROSHN K 43d
18692075 Manufacturing a Component Carrier by a Nano Imprint Lithography Process AYCHILLHUM, ANDARGIE M 72d

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
2847 3
2848 1
2896 1
2817 1
2893 1
2837 1
2899 1

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
18692075 Manufacturing a Component Carrier by a Nano Imprint Lithography Process AYCHILLHUM, ANDARGIE M 2848 §103 Non-Final OA 72d Pending Mar 14, 2024
18692032 Stamping Surface Profile in Design Layer and Filling an Indentation With Metallic Base Structure and Electroplating Structure SAWYER, STEVEN T 2847 §103 Non-Final OA 4d overdue Pending Mar 14, 2024
18605509 Component Carrier With Continuously Extending Vertical Connection Structure, and Manufacturing Method VARGHESE, ROSHN K 2896 §103 Non-Final OA 43d Pending Mar 14, 2024
18479944 Package having component carrier with cavity and electronic component as well as functional filling medium therein CRITE, ANTONIO B 2817 §103 Non-Final OA 1d overdue Pending Oct 03, 2023
18253341 Component Carrier For Waveguide Applications SHARMA, ADITYA 2847 §103 Final Rejection 12d Pending May 17, 2023
18301244 Metal Body Formed on a Component Carrier by Additive Manufacturing ALONZO MILLER, RHADAMES J 2847 §103 Final Rejection 141d overdue Pending Apr 16, 2023
18193461 Component Carrier With Solder Mask Having Curved Sidewalls Interacting With Legend Marking BARZYKIN, VICTOR V 2893 §103 Final Rejection 34d Pending Mar 30, 2023
18182272 Inductor Inlay for a Component Carrier and a Method of Manufacturing the Same CHAN, TSZFUNG JACKIE 2837 §103 Non-Final OA 15d Pending Mar 10, 2023
18160406 Module Comprising a Semiconductor-based Component and Method of Manufacturing the Same TYNES JR., LAWRENCE C 2899 §103 Final Rejection 75d Pending Jan 27, 2023

Managing At&S Austria Technologie & Systemtechnik AG's Patent Portfolio?

IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month