Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 08, 2026

Artegis Law Group, LLP

Technology areas: Computing & Software • Networking & Security

92 pending office actions • 13 clients • 84 examiners • 47 art units • 1 of 92 (1%) have an AI response strategy ready

Analysis

Artegis Law Group, LLP specializes in Computing & Software, with 2206 career applications on record. The firm currently manages 70 pending office actions. Its resolved allowance rate pct is 95.46, reflecting an exceptionally high success rate for resolved applications. This 95.46 rate is a testament to the firm's effectiveness across its 2206 career applications in the software field.

The firm's avg office actions per allowance is 6.06. This high average suggests that while the 95.46 resolved allowance rate pct is strong, the path to allowance involves significant examiner interaction over many rounds. For the 2206 career applications, the 6.06 average highlights the intensive nature of prosecution in the computing and software sector. Practitioners should prepare for a lengthy examination process, as the 6.06 avg office actions per allowance indicates that reaching an allowance often takes six or more office actions. The 70 pending office actions represent a substantial active portfolio that will likely require this high level of persistence to reach the firm's 95.46 resolved allowance rate pct.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Quality Metrics (n=2206 apps, methodology: how we score firms)

95.5%
Allowance Rate
n=2206
+0.71σ
Allowance Rate (norm)
n=2206
6.1
OAs to Allowance
n=1326
+1.05σ
OAs to Allow (norm)
n=1326
1377 days
Time to Allowance
n=1326
+1.5pp
Interview Lift
n=2206
62.2%
RCE Rate
n=2206
3.0%
Appeal Rate
n=2206

Rejection Performance (% of received rejections ultimately overcome)

83.9%
§101 Overcome
n=533
83.0%
§102 Overcome
n=716
84.0%
§103 Overcome
n=1165
85.3%
§112 Overcome
n=529

Specialization & Scale

G06F, G06T, H04R
Top CPC Subclasses
34%
Top-3 CPC Share
n=2206
3
Practitioners
n=2206
735.3
Apps / Practitioner
n=2206

Portfolio Summary

92
Total Pending OAs
57
Non-Final OAs
27
Final Rejections
8
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 35 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

11
Overdue
1
Due this week
14
Due this month
7
Due in next 60 days
2
Due later

Deadline Fire Line

Every pending office action with a known statutory deadline, placed on a days-until-due axis. Dots left of Today are overdue; the further right, the more runway. Cases that share a deadline window stack vertically. 35 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date.

-30dToday30d60d90d120d
Overdue (11)Due ≤ 7 days (1)Due ≤ 30 days (14)Due ≤ 60 days (7)Due later (2)

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

46
Hard (50%)
44
Medium (48%)
2
Easy (2%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§101 only1 (1%)
§101 + other21 (23%)
§103 only37 (40%)
§102 only4 (4%)
§112 only1 (1%)
Double-patenting only1 (1%)
Double-patenting + other3 (3%)
Multi-statute (no §101)24 (26%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

2
Life Sciences
2% of docket
45
Information Tech
49% of docket
7
Communications
8% of docket
1
Semiconductors
1% of docket
13
Mechanical / Eng
14% of docket
24
Business / Other
26% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

920 h
Manual time on pending OAs
184 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
322 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
8.1 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
LANGHALS, RENEE C 2 58.6% +42.7%
SU, SARAH 2 80.2% +18.0%
FEREJA, SAMUEL D 2 74.9% +10.4%
SULLIVAN, TYLER 2 67.0% +29.8%
VAUGHN JR, WILLIAM C 2 34.5% +50.2%
NGUYEN, HIEN NGOC 2 52.5% +40.8%
CASTILLO-TORRES, KEISHA Y 2 74.4% +33.2%
HAO, YI 2 35.2% +48.2%
IP, JASON M 1 55.2% +25.1%
SKUBINNA, CHRISTINE J 1 61.6% +20.0%

Quick Wins (2)

Cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate of 80%+ where the difficulty is Easy or Medium. The top 2 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
19070092 TECHNIQUES FOR ACCESSING AND INTERACTING WITH DATA USING DATA ABSTRACTION LAYERS IMPLEMENTED BY A DATA GATEWAY SU, SARAH —
19070089 TECHNIQUES FOR ACCESSING AND INTERACTING WITH DATA USING DATA ABSTRACTION LAYERS IMPLEMENTED BY A DATA GATEWAY SU, SARAH —

Hard Cases (46)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 8 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
17960049 POSITIVITY VALIDATION AND EXPLAINABILITY FOR CAUSAL INFERENCE VIA ASYMMETRICALLY PRUNED DECISION TREES RAHMAN, IBRAHIM 89d overdue
17192515 MACHINE LEARNING TECHNIQUES FOR GENERATING ENJOYMENT SIGNALS FOR WEIGHTING TRAINING DATA FACCENDA, GISEL GABRIELA 45d overdue
17687535 COMPUTER-AIDED TECHNIQUES FOR AUTOMATICALLY GENERATING DESIGNS THAT REFLECT DESIGN INTENTS HOANG, AMY P 44d overdue
18735423 AIRFLOW REDIRECTION AIR-HANDLING UNIT BANKS, KEONA LAUREN 31d overdue
18909120 TFUS SYSTEM CONFIGURED WITH SIMPLIFIED PROBES ROZANSKI, MICHAEL T 5d
18129186 LUMINAIRE CHILLED BEAM FAULKNER, RYAN L 13d
17098228 GENERATING BUILDING DESIGNS WHILE COMPUTATIONALLY OPTIMIZING FOR WORK CONDITIONS GIRI, PURSOTTAM 14d
18904036 TECHNIQUES FOR DEBANDING IN THE INVERSE TRANSFORM STAGE OF A VIDEO CODING PIPELINE SUH, JOSEPH JINWOO 30d

Interview Candidates (18)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 8 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
19058925 TECHNIQUES FOR SCALING STEP SIZES WHEN PERFORMING TRELLIS CODED QUANTIZATION FEREJA, SAMUEL D 31d overdue
19058931 TECHNIQUES FOR SCALING A RATE-DISTORTION MULTIPLIER WHEN PERFORMING TRELLIS CODED QUANTIZATION FEREJA, SAMUEL D 31d overdue
19058938 TECHNIQUES FOR PERFORMING TRELLIS CODED QUANTIZATION WHEN ENCODING VIDEO DATA SULLIVAN, TYLER 14d
19041884 TECHNIQUES FOR DETERMINING QUALITY OF VIDEOS WITH SYNTHESIZED FILM GRAIN VAUGHN JR, WILLIAM C 21d
19058945 TECHNIQUES FOR PERFORMING ENTROPY CODING ON A QUANTIZATION INDEX WHEN ENCODING VIDEO DATA SULLIVAN, TYLER 34d
17864252 GENERATING RULES FOR MANAGING AN INFRASTRUCTURE FROM NATURAL-LANGUAGE EXPRESSIONS CASTILLO-TORRES, KEISHA Y 54d
19301600 CRANIAL ACOUSTIC COUPLING APPARATUS AND METHODS IP, JASON M —
19221273 APPARATUS FOR TOILET SEAT LIFTING SKUBINNA, CHRISTINE J —

Client Portfolio (13 clients)

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
37976
24875
21542
24252
24852
21612
21652
21952
21452
26592

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleClientExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
19301600 CRANIAL ACOUSTIC COUPLING APPARATUS AND METHODS Sanmai Technologies, Pbc IP, JASON M §103 Final Rejection — Pending Aug 15, 2025
19221273 APPARATUS FOR TOILET SEAT LIFTING Bu Innovations, LLC SKUBINNA, CHRISTINE J §102DP Non-Final OA — Pending May 28, 2025
19195150 ADJUSTABLE TRANSCRANIAL ULTRASOUND HEADSET Sanmai Technologies, Pbc NGANGA, BONIFACE N 3797 §103 Final Rejection 21d Pending Apr 30, 2025
19185119 MODIFICATION OF A SOCKET NETWORK NAMESPACE IN RESPONSE TO A SYSTEM CALL INTERCEPTION Netflix, Inc. YU, XIANG §102Other Non-Final OA — Pending Apr 21, 2025
19170935 ADJUSTABLE PROBE FOR TRANSCRANIAL ULTRASOUND Sanmai Technologies, Pbc LANGHALS, RENEE C 3797 §103§112 Final Rejection — Pending Apr 04, 2025
19098837 MEASURING AND TRACKING TRANSCRANIAL FOCUSED ULTRASOUND STIMULATION AND MODULATION EFFICACY Sanmai Technologies, Pbc KOLKIN, ADAM D. 3798 §102§103 Non-Final OA — Pending Apr 02, 2025
19082057 DISTRIBUTED STORAGE SYSTEM JOURNAL ON A SINGLE MEMORY PAGE Nutanix, Inc. PHAN, TUANKHANH D 2154 §103 Final Rejection 35d overdue Pending Mar 17, 2025
19082109 TECHNIQUES FOR STORING AND ACCESSING DATA USING AN INFORMATION MODEL Autodesk, Inc. NGUYEN, CINDY 2156 §102DP Non-Final OA — Pending Mar 17, 2025
19074137 TECHNIQUES FOR STREAMING LIVE MEDIA CONTENT WITH MEDIA EVENTS Netflix, Inc. CHOKSHI, PINKAL R 2425 §103 Non-Final OA — Pending Mar 07, 2025
19070092 TECHNIQUES FOR ACCESSING AND INTERACTING WITH DATA USING DATA ABSTRACTION LAYERS IMPLEMENTED BY A DATA GATEWAY Netflix, Inc. SU, SARAH §103 Non-Final OA — Pending Mar 04, 2025
19070089 TECHNIQUES FOR ACCESSING AND INTERACTING WITH DATA USING DATA ABSTRACTION LAYERS IMPLEMENTED BY A DATA GATEWAY Netflix, Inc. SU, SARAH §103 Non-Final OA — Pending Mar 04, 2025
19058925 TECHNIQUES FOR SCALING STEP SIZES WHEN PERFORMING TRELLIS CODED QUANTIZATION Netflix, Inc. FEREJA, SAMUEL D 2487 §103 Final Rejection 31d overdue Pending Feb 20, 2025
19058931 TECHNIQUES FOR SCALING A RATE-DISTORTION MULTIPLIER WHEN PERFORMING TRELLIS CODED QUANTIZATION Netflix, Inc. FEREJA, SAMUEL D 2487 §103 Non-Final OA 31d overdue Pending Feb 20, 2025
19058938 TECHNIQUES FOR PERFORMING TRELLIS CODED QUANTIZATION WHEN ENCODING VIDEO DATA Netflix, Inc. SULLIVAN, TYLER 2487 §103 Final Rejection 14d Pending Feb 20, 2025
19058985 TECHNIQUES FOR PERFORMING BOTH SCALAR QUANTIZATION AND TRELLIS CODED QUANTIZATION WHEN ENCODING VIDEO DATA Netflix, Inc. HODGES, SUSAN E 2425 §102 Final Rejection 29d Pending Feb 20, 2025
19058945 TECHNIQUES FOR PERFORMING ENTROPY CODING ON A QUANTIZATION INDEX WHEN ENCODING VIDEO DATA Netflix, Inc. SULLIVAN, TYLER 2487 §103§112 Final Rejection 34d Pending Feb 20, 2025
19051066 RETARGETING CHARACTER PARAMETERS TO SIMPLIFY STACK PROCESSING FOR DEVELOPING DIVERSE VIRTUAL ENVIRONMENTS Autodesk, Inc. LEE, SARAH YEO §102§103 Non-Final OA — Pending Feb 11, 2025
19041884 TECHNIQUES FOR DETERMINING QUALITY OF VIDEOS WITH SYNTHESIZED FILM GRAIN Netflix, Inc. VAUGHN JR, WILLIAM C 2400 §103Other Final Rejection 21d Pending Jan 30, 2025
19034253 SCREEN SAVER USER INTERFACE IN CRITICAL ENVIRONMENTS Price Industries Limited THOMPSON, JAMES A §103§112 Non-Final OA — Pending Jan 22, 2025
19030709 TECHNIQUES FOR SCALING REGIONS OF INTEREST Netflix, Inc. KIR, ALBERT 2485 §102§103 Final Rejection — Pending Jan 17, 2025
19015457 TECHNIQUES FOR AVM COEFFICIENT ENCODING Netflix, Inc. LE, PETER D 2488 §103 Non-Final OA 44d overdue Pending Jan 09, 2025
19005926 TRAINING MACHINE LEARNING MODELS TO PERFORM NEURAL STYLE TRANSFER IN THREE-DIMENSIONAL SHAPES Autodesk, Inc. ROBINSON, TERRELL M DP Non-Final OA — Pending Dec 30, 2024
19005915 NEURAL STYLE TRANSFER IN THREE-DIMENSIONAL SHAPES Autodesk, Inc. PATEL, SHIVANG I §103 Non-Final OA — Pending Dec 30, 2024
18986860 TREATMENT DEVICES WITH ANTI-TAMPERING, SECURITY, AND TRANSPARENCY FEATURES Sanmai Technologies, Pbc GARTLAND, SCOTT D 3685 §101§102§103 Final Rejection 36d Pending Dec 19, 2024
18974150 TECHNIQUES FOR CLIENT-SIDE UPSCALING OF VIDEO GAMES Netflix, Inc. WONG, JEFFREY KEITH 3715 §101§102§112 Non-Final OA — Pending Dec 09, 2024
18961013 PLAYBACK SIGNAL MANAGEMENT Netflix, Inc. ROBINSON, CHRISTOPHER B 2443 §103 Non-Final OA — Pending Nov 26, 2024
18916489 NON-IMAGING TFUS SYSTEMS Sanmai Technologies, Pbc NGUYEN, HIEN NGOC 3797 §103 Non-Final OA — Pending Oct 15, 2024
18916488 TECHNIQUES FOR MOTION EDITING FOR CHARACTER ANIMATIONS Autodesk, Inc. CHOWDHURY, RAYEEZ R §102§103 Non-Final OA — Pending Oct 15, 2024
18909120 TFUS SYSTEM CONFIGURED WITH SIMPLIFIED PROBES Sanmai Technologies, Pbc ROZANSKI, MICHAEL T 3797 §102§103§112 Final Rejection 5d Pending Oct 08, 2024
18908563 SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR PROVIDING OPTIMIZED TIME SCALES AND ACCURATE PRESENTATION TIME STAMPS Netflix, Inc. VAUGHN JR, WILLIAM C 2484 §103Other Non-Final OA — Pending Oct 07, 2024
18905006 TECHNIQUES FOR LEARNING CO-ENGAGEMENT AND SEMANTIC RELATIONSHIPS USING GRAPH NEURAL NETWORKS Netflix, Inc. KOLB JR, BRETT DAVID §102§103 Non-Final OA — Pending Oct 02, 2024
18904036 TECHNIQUES FOR DEBANDING IN THE INVERSE TRANSFORM STAGE OF A VIDEO CODING PIPELINE Netflix, Inc. SUH, JOSEPH JINWOO 2485 §102§103 Non-Final OA 30d Pending Oct 01, 2024
18852539 TEST SYSTEM FOR HIGH-VOLTAGE AND HIGH-CURRENT TESTING ON A PLURALITY OF POWER SEMICONDUCTOR DEVICES COMPRISED IN A WAFER, AND CONTACTING SYSTEM Crea Collaudi Elettronici Automatizzati S.r.l. PHAN, MINH Q 2852 §102§103 Final Rejection — Pending Sep 30, 2024
18883586 DATABASE CACHING BASED ON QUERY WORKLOAD Nutanix, Inc. ROSTAMI, MOHAMMAD S 2154 §101§103 Non-Final OA — Pending Sep 12, 2024
18882561 TECHNIQUES FOR OPTIMIZED ROUTING OF INPUTS TO MACHINE LEARNING MODELS Netflix, Inc. PRESSLY, KURT NICHOLAS §101§103§112 Non-Final OA — Pending Sep 11, 2024
18829009 TECHNIQUES FOR OPTIMIZED STORAGE UTILIZATION IN LIVE ORIGIN SERVERS Netflix, Inc. GIROUARD, JANICE MARIE 2138 §112 Non-Final OA — Pending Sep 09, 2024
18824687 TECHNIQUES FOR ADAPTIVE MULTI-LEVEL RECOMMENDATION USING HIERARCHICAL MIXTURE-OF-EXPERTS FRAMEWORK Netflix, Inc. WEHOVZ, OSCAR 2161 §103 Non-Final OA 5d overdue Pending Sep 04, 2024
18784690 USER FEEDBACK MECHANISM FOR SOFTWARE APPLICATIONS Autodesk, Inc. YU, XINYUAN 2114 §101§102§103Other Final Rejection — Pending Jul 25, 2024
18782472 APPARATUS COMPATIBLE WITH PHYSIOLOGICAL MEASUREMENT SYSTEMS AND ULTRASOUND BEAM GUIDANCE CONFIGURED WITH ULTRASOUND AND EEG POSTS Sanmai Technologies, Pbc NGUYEN, HIEN NGOC 3797 §102§103§112 Final Rejection — Pending Jul 24, 2024
18783245 APPARATUS COMPATIBLE WITH PHYSIOLOGICAL MEASUREMENT SYSTEMS AND ULTRASOUND BEAM GUIDANCE FOR NEURO NAVIGATION Sanmai Technologies, Pbc LANGHALS, RENEE C 3797 §103§112 Non-Final OA — Pending Jul 24, 2024
18783222 SHIELDING TECHNIQUES FOR APPARATUS COMPATIBLE WITH PHYSIOLOGICAL MEASUREMENT SYSTEMS AND ULTRASOUND BEAM GUIDANCE Sanmai Technologies, Pbc HEALY, NOAH MICHAEL §102§103DP Non-Final OA — Pending Jul 24, 2024
18770317 SOUND-REDUCING EXHAUST AIR SYSTEM Price Industries Limited TIGHE, DANA K §102§103 Non-Final OA — Pending Jul 11, 2024
18765122 MULTI-USER PROMPTS FOR GENERATIVE ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE SYSTEMS Autodesk, Inc. WU, MING HAN 2618 §103 Non-Final OA 28d Pending Jul 05, 2024
18752646 TECHNIQUES FOR FABRICATING COMPOSITE REBARS AND BEAMS Xaba Inc. MALEKZADEH, SEYED MASOUD 1754 §102§103§112 Non-Final OA — Pending Jun 24, 2024
18750783 TECHNIQUES FOR ENABLING CONVERSATIONAL USER INTERFACES FOR SIMULATION APPLICATIONS VIA LANGUAGE MODELS Autodesk, Inc. MARU, MATIYAS T §101§102§103 Non-Final OA — Pending Jun 21, 2024
18735423 AIRFLOW REDIRECTION AIR-HANDLING UNIT Price Industries, Inc., BANKS, KEONA LAUREN 3763 §102§103§112 Non-Final OA 31d overdue Pending Jun 06, 2024
18669517 LOW CROSS-TALK INTERCONNECTION DEVICE WITH IMPEDANCE-TUNED HYBRID SHIELDING STRUCTURES FOR INTEGRATED CIRCUIT DEVICE TEST TOOLING Essai, Inc. ZAKARIA, AKM 3726 §102§103 Non-Final OA — Pending May 20, 2024
18651433 TECHNIQUES FOR MONITORING MACHINE LEARNING MODEL PERFORMANCE VIANAI SYSTEMS, INC. WONG, LUT §101§102§103 Non-Final OA — Pending Apr 30, 2024
18649857 TECHNIQUES FOR SIMULATING A LIVE EDGE IN A LIVE FIELD TEST Netflix, Inc. SALCE, JASON P 2421 §103 Non-Final OA 56d Pending Apr 29, 2024
18649891 TECHNIQUES FOR USING MACHINE LEARNING MODELS TO GENERATE SCENES BASED UPON IMAGE TILES Autodesk, Inc. BROOME, SAID A 2612 §103§112 Non-Final OA — Pending Apr 29, 2024

View all 92 →

Managing Artegis Law Group, LLP's Patent Prosecution?

IP Author helps law firms respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Frequently Asked Questions

What is Artegis Law Group, LLP's patent allowance rate?

95.5% of resolved applications prosecuted by Artegis Law Group, LLP were allowed, across 2,206 applications in USPTO records.

How many office actions does Artegis Law Group, LLP average before allowance?

6.06 office actions per allowed application on average.

How many pending office actions does Artegis Law Group, LLP have?

92 pending office actions as of October 2026, for 13 clients, before 84 examiners in 47 art units.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month