Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 19, 2026

Foley & Lardner LLP - Tokyo Electron

Technology areas: Chemistry & Materials • Semiconductors, Circuits & Optics

5 pending office actions • 1 client • 5 examiners • 3 art units • 0 of 5 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 32 patents granted in the last 365 days

Analysis

Foley & Lardner LLP - Tokyo Electron handles 5 pending office actions in the Chemistry & Materials technology area. The firm's career history includes 116888 applications. Across these 116888 career applications, the firm has achieved a resolved allowance rate of 87.01 percent. This 87.01 percent rate provides a success metric for its chemistry and materials prosecution. The 5 pending office actions represent the current workload.

The firm averages 3.23 office actions per allowance. This 3.23 average serves as a benchmark for the expected intensity of prosecution. The resolved allowance rate and the average office actions per allowance are based on the firm's 116888 career applications. These figures establish the firm's historical performance. Practitioners can use the 3.23 average office actions per allowance to estimate the effort required for the 5 pending matters.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Quality Metrics (n=116888 apps, methodology: how we score firms)

87.0%
Allowance Rate
n=116888
+0.60σ
Allowance Rate (norm)
n=116888
3.2
OAs to Allowance
n=77844
-0.23σ
OAs to Allow (norm)
n=77844
1038 days
Time to Allowance
n=77844
+7.4pp
Interview Lift
n=116888
26.5%
RCE Rate
n=116888
1.6%
Appeal Rate
n=116888

Rejection Performance (% of received rejections ultimately overcome)

78.9%
§101 Overcome
n=10420
80.3%
§102 Overcome
n=29681
80.6%
§103 Overcome
n=47307
82.5%
§112 Overcome
n=30232

Specialization & Scale

G06F, A61K, G06Q
Top CPC Subclasses
13%
Top-3 CPC Share
n=116888
159
Practitioners
n=116888
735.1
Apps / Practitioner
n=116888

Portfolio Summary

5
Total Pending OAs
2
Non-Final OAs
3
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 2 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

1
Overdue
0
Due this week
1
Due this month
0
Due in next 60 days
0
Due later

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

1
Hard (20%)
3
Medium (60%)
1
Easy (20%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§103 only2 (40%)
§102 only1 (20%)
§112 only1 (20%)
Multi-statute (no §101)1 (20%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

3
Life Sciences
60% of docket
0
Information Tech
0% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
2
Semiconductors
40% of docket
0
Mechanical / Eng
0% of docket
0
Business / Other
0% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

50 h
Manual time on pending OAs
10 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
18 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.4 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
DUCLAIR, STEPHANIE P. 1 72.3% +19.6%
LAOBAK, ANDREW KEELAN 1 75.8% +34.7%
BOWEN, ADAM S 1 96.5% +2.3%
PHAM, THOMAS T 1 51.4% +15.7%
BAIG, ANEESA RIAZ 1 93.8% +7.9%

Quick Wins (2)

Cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate of 80%+ where the difficulty is Easy or Medium. The top 2 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
17893736 METHOD OF MAKING A PLURALITY OF 3D SEMICONDUCTOR DEVICES WITH ENHANCED MOBILITY AND CONDUCTIVITY BAIG, ANEESA RIAZ 145d overdue
18597762 SYMMETRICAL 3D BIPOLAR NANOSHEET TRANSISTOR BOWEN, ADAM S —

Hard Cases (1)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18607202 HARC ETCH CHEMISTRY FOR SEMINCONDUCTORS LAOBAK, ANDREW KEELAN —

Interview Candidates (3)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 3 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18433320 DIRECT CURRENT SUPERPOSITION (DCS) FOR PROTECTION OF ORGANIC MANDREL DURING SPACER DEPOSITION PHAM, THOMAS T 27d
18781793 ETCHING SYSTEM FOR FORMING RECESSED FEATURES WITH HIGH ASPECT RATIO DUCLAIR, STEPHANIE P. —
18607202 HARC ETCH CHEMISTRY FOR SEMINCONDUCTORS LAOBAK, ANDREW KEELAN —

Client Portfolio (1 client)

Client (Assignee)Pending OAs
Tokyo Electron 5

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
17133
28971
28141

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleClientExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
18781793 ETCHING SYSTEM FOR FORMING RECESSED FEATURES WITH HIGH ASPECT RATIO Tokyo Electron Limited DUCLAIR, STEPHANIE P. 1713 §103 Non-Final OA — Pending Jul 23, 2024
18607202 HARC ETCH CHEMISTRY FOR SEMINCONDUCTORS Tokyo Electron Limited LAOBAK, ANDREW KEELAN 1713 §102§103 Final Rejection — Pending Mar 15, 2024
18597762 SYMMETRICAL 3D BIPOLAR NANOSHEET TRANSISTOR Tokyo Electron Limited BOWEN, ADAM S 2897 §102 Non-Final OA — Pending Mar 06, 2024
18433320 DIRECT CURRENT SUPERPOSITION (DCS) FOR PROTECTION OF ORGANIC MANDREL DURING SPACER DEPOSITION Tokyo Electron Limited PHAM, THOMAS T 1713 §103 Final Rejection 27d Pending Feb 05, 2024
17893736 METHOD OF MAKING A PLURALITY OF 3D SEMICONDUCTOR DEVICES WITH ENHANCED MOBILITY AND CONDUCTIVITY Tokyo Electron Limited BAIG, ANEESA RIAZ 2814 §112 Final Rejection 145d overdue Pending Aug 23, 2022

Managing Foley & Lardner LLP - Tokyo Electron's Patent Prosecution?

IP Author helps law firms respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Frequently Asked Questions

What is Foley & Lardner LLP - Tokyo Electron's patent allowance rate?

87.0% of resolved applications prosecuted by Foley & Lardner LLP - Tokyo Electron were allowed, across 116,888 applications in USPTO records.

How many office actions does Foley & Lardner LLP - Tokyo Electron average before allowance?

3.23 office actions per allowed application on average.

How many pending office actions does Foley & Lardner LLP - Tokyo Electron have?

5 pending office actions as of October 2026, for 1 client, before 5 examiners in 3 art units.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month