Prosecution Insights
Last updated: May 29, 2026

Bond Schoeneck & King, Pllc

7 pending office actions • 4 clients • 7 examiners • 7 art units • 0 of 7 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 17 patents granted in the last 365 days

Portfolio Summary

7
Total Pending OAs
5
Non-Final OAs
1
Final Rejections
1
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 6 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

5
Overdue
0
Due this week
1
Due this month
0
Due in next 60 days
0
Due later

Deadline Fire Line

Every pending office action with a known statutory deadline, placed on a days-until-due axis. Dots left of Today are overdue; the further right, the more runway. Cases that share a deadline window stack vertically. 6 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date.

-30dToday30d60d90d120d
Overdue (5)Due ≤ 30 days (1)

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

1
Hard (14%)
4
Medium (57%)
1
Easy (14%)
1
Unknown (14%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§101 only1 (14%)
§103 only4 (57%)
§112 only1 (14%)
No statute on record1 (14%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

5
Life Sciences
71% of docket
0
Information Tech
0% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
1
Semiconductors
14% of docket
1
Mechanical / Eng
14% of docket
0
Business / Other
0% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

70 h
Manual time on pending OAs
14 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
24 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.6 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
LABRANCHE, BROOKE N 1 72.9% +14.6%
MCDONOUGH, JAMES E 1 71.4% +11.1%
PATEL, PREET BAKUL 1 20.0% -33.3%
SHOMER, ISAAC 1 63.1% +30.7%
WARTALOWICZ, PAUL A 1 64.0% +18.4%
GONZALEZ RAMOS, MAYLA 1 53.9% +14.2%
VASSELL, MEREDITH ABBOTT 1 28.8% +47.2%

Hard Cases (2)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 2 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18030837 CURVED LIGHTGUIDE AND APPARATUS AND METHODS EMPLOYING A CURVED LIGHTGUIDE PATEL, PREET BAKUL 42d overdue
16612647 METHODS AND SYSTEMS FOR ASSESSING THE PRESENCE OF ALLELIC DROPOUT USING MACHINE LEARNING ALGORITHMS VASSELL, MEREDITH ABBOTT

Interview Candidates (6)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 6 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18573512 STEERABLE ROBOTIC NEEDLES WITH TUNABLE STIFFNESS SEGMENTS FOR LARGE CURVATURE MANEUVERS LABRANCHE, BROOKE N 168d overdue
17807549 Longpass Distributed Bragg Reflector (LPDBR) GONZALEZ RAMOS, MAYLA 155d overdue
18140075 SURFACE TOPOGRAPHY WITH FERROMAGNETIC POLYMER PILLARS CAPABLE OF MOVEMENT IN RESPONSE TO MAGNETIC FIELDS MCDONOUGH, JAMES E 11d overdue
18122221 SUGAR-COATED MELANIN NANOPARTICLES AND METHOD FOR TARGETING METASTATIC CANCER CELLS SHOMER, ISAAC 5d overdue
17872833 ENHANCEMENT OF SUPERCONDUCTIVITY VIA RESONANT ANTI-SHIELDING WARTALOWICZ, PAUL A 28d
16612647 METHODS AND SYSTEMS FOR ASSESSING THE PRESENCE OF ALLELIC DROPOUT USING MACHINE LEARNING ALGORITHMS VASSELL, MEREDITH ABBOTT

Client Portfolio (4 clients)

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
37711
17341
28741
16121
17351
17211
16871

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleClientExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
18573512 STEERABLE ROBOTIC NEEDLES WITH TUNABLE STIFFNESS SEGMENTS FOR LARGE CURVATURE MANEUVERS Syracuse University LABRANCHE, BROOKE N 3771 Non-Final OA 168d overdue Pending Dec 22, 2023
18140075 SURFACE TOPOGRAPHY WITH FERROMAGNETIC POLYMER PILLARS CAPABLE OF MOVEMENT IN RESPONSE TO MAGNETIC FIELDS Syracuse University MCDONOUGH, JAMES E 1734 §103 Non-Final OA 11d overdue Pending Apr 27, 2023
18030837 CURVED LIGHTGUIDE AND APPARATUS AND METHODS EMPLOYING A CURVED LIGHTGUIDE UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER PATEL, PREET BAKUL 2874 §103 Final Rejection 42d overdue Pending Apr 07, 2023
18122221 SUGAR-COATED MELANIN NANOPARTICLES AND METHOD FOR TARGETING METASTATIC CANCER CELLS The Trustees of Boston College SHOMER, ISAAC 1612 §103 Non-Final OA 5d overdue Pending Mar 16, 2023
17872833 ENHANCEMENT OF SUPERCONDUCTIVITY VIA RESONANT ANTI-SHIELDING The Trustees of Boston College WARTALOWICZ, PAUL A 1735 §103 Non-Final OA 28d Pending Jul 25, 2022
17807549 Longpass Distributed Bragg Reflector (LPDBR) Rochester Institute Of Technology GONZALEZ RAMOS, MAYLA 1721 §112 Non-Final OA 155d overdue Pending Jun 17, 2022
16612647 METHODS AND SYSTEMS FOR ASSESSING THE PRESENCE OF ALLELIC DROPOUT USING MACHINE LEARNING ALGORITHMS Syracuse University VASSELL, MEREDITH ABBOTT 1687 §101 Non-Final OA Pending Nov 11, 2019

Managing Bond Schoeneck & King, Pllc's Patent Prosecution?

IP Author helps law firms respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month